There are so many facets of ADHD that I could discuss, but foundational to the discussion of ADHD is the question of its existence.
First of all, how is it defined? ADHD is a disorder of impulse control that is manifest by difficulties with maintaining attention and difficulties with increased poorly controlled activity (my definition). The psychologists have a more thorough definition, and one that we use in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual IV (DSM IV). An example of the full definition can be found here. The DSM IV describes ADHD. If a child has behavior that fits the description in the DSM IV without another cause, they are said to have ADHD.
Is ADHD real? Yes. Is it necessarily a disease? No. Is its prevalence (the number of people in a population who have this diagnosis) a reflection of what I believe to be ADHD? No. Given the description in the DSM IV countless children and adults fit ADHD. ADHD exists because people who fit the defined pattern of behavior exist. This does not address causation, contributing factors, solutions, treatment, perceptions, and reality. Many physicians see ADHD as a medical diagnosis (a disease) that requires medical management. I don’t believe this is always the case.
The problem with ADHD is not, “Does it exist?” ADHD as a description of behavior is real. The problems include diagnosis, contributing factors, cause, and treatment of ADHD.
More later…. I will probably deal with issues that contribute to ADHD next.
I would be glad to entertain questions, clarifications, and snide remarks.
I am looking forward to your comments on this topic, Lee.
NeoFundy
Left by NeoFundy on November 26th, 2005